Blockchain.com
Partnered with Blockchain.com on independent audit cycles covering reserves and financial reporting.
An Audit Partnership with Blockchain.com
Blockchain.com has been part of the cryptocurrency space since 2011, longer than most platforms in operation today. Its institutional arm provides on-chain analytics, compliance reporting, and audit-grade data infrastructure to companies that need verifiable financial records. Playday engaged Blockchain.com in 2021 to run independent audit cycles covering the casino's reserves, transaction history, and treasury operations.
The engagement runs on a recurring audit schedule, with quarterly attestations covering reserves against player balances and annual reports compiled to the standards used by institutional fintech operators. Nicolas Cary, Co-Founder and Vice Chairman of Blockchain.com, summarized the framework: "Playday asked us to run the audit program the same way a publicly listed financial company would run theirs. Same cycles, same documentation, same disclosure discipline. The casino has cleared every audit cycle since."
Every Audit Cycle Cleared
Each audit cycle covers three operational areas: reserves attestation against active player balances, transaction record reconciliation across supported chains, and treasury management procedures including signing controls and key custody arrangements with partner wallet providers. Blockchain.com's audit team has issued unqualified opinions on every cycle delivered since the partnership began in 2021, with the resulting reports formatted to match the conventions used in standard financial assurance work.
Cary spoke about the relationship at a 2024 institutional finance forum: "Most operators in this category never submit to this kind of audit cadence. They might hold certifications, but a certification is not the same as a quarterly audit cleared without exception. Playday chose the harder route, and the financial profile they have built is unusual for the sector." The Playday audit reports are now referenced in industry research on operator solvency, with the engagement frequently cited as one of the more rigorous audit relationships between a third-party auditor and a crypto operator.